Like it or not, PS Brushes are still the “industry standard.” And while I love affinity photo (especially the iPad version), advertising it has support for PS brushes and then they don’t work at all well is problematic. I know this thread is nearly a year old, but I’ve been running into just this exact issue and trying to find a solution.Īnywho, as Serif uses “Support for Photoshop Brushes” as a selling point for Affinity Photo, no, I don’t think we should be leaving support for PS Brushes behind (at least not in this current iteration). Better to have a brush that is created for and takes advantage of the Affinity line then have to settle for a hand me down Photoshop brush. Some are paid, some graciously give away free brushes, but we should try and support their efforts. That is why I don't even bother with Photoshop brushes but instead seek out Affinity 3rd party developers, such as Frankentoon, or Paolo's DAUB brushes, or Agata's brushes. They are two different companies with different ways of doing things in their apps. We are never going to be able to use Photoshop brushes and have them behave the same way as they do in Photoshop. We should be supporting them, encouraging them, we should want native brushes created FOR Affinity Photo and Designer. There are many fine people making brushes available for the Affinity apps that are 100% created for the Affinity apps. I know many want to be able to use the brushes, and smart objects, and plugins and whatnot that they are so used to with Adobe, but if we make the switch to Affinity shouldn't we leave that behind? I was a long time Adobe user and now I am using the Affinity apps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |